
"What's a good lesson using PowerPoint?..."
This question, posed recently on one
of my
email discussion forums, begs the real question - "...a lesson
on what?" This is a little like asking "How can I justify
purchasing a Sports Utility Vehicle?"
In our society, we are constantly assaulted by
advertising to purchase this object or that service. Some of those
ads really give information about the item they are promoting, but most just try to get
us to feel good about the targeted brand, creating a need where none
existed before. If we were smart shoppers, we'd do our homework
before we spent our money. In buying that car, the best way would be for us to analyze our driving
habits, then, with this information, try to find the vehicle
that best meets those needs for the least amount of money. Sound
like a fun way to buy a car? No?
Of course, as public educators, we can't afford to
simply listen to the "advertisers" (technology promoters) and their appeal to our
emotions, since we must justify our "purchases" (use of
instructional time) to the
taxpayers. In designing curriculum, we have a professional
responsibility to provide the core content assigned
to our discipline and grade level. We also should (if we know what's
good for us!) include that which our students will be tested on
through the CATS system. This means that we start with a lesson
objective, and then examine what we should include to help us
achieve that lesson objective. Technology - or, in this case,
PowerPoint - might very well be that tool, but unless its supporting
the core curriculum, it's simply taking up space.
"But
wait, doesn't our district have technology learning objectives?
Don't they include PowerPoint?" Good question - you're paying
attention! There are specific technology skills we are obligated to
address, and specific grade levels by which mastery is supposed to
be achieved. The
problem is - whose curriculum is that? What discipline is obligated
to teach PowerPoint? Social Studies? English? The answer, of course,
is all of them! However, if the mathematics content coordinator for
Fayette County was told that two weeks was going to be removed from
the time available to address mathematics so that students could
learn PowerPoint, she'd be camping out at
the superintendent's door the next day!
The point is that technology, any technology, is a
tool through which we learn, and otherwise do our business. Computer
technologies have been shown to be great enhancers of instruction -
generating enthusiasm in students, providing for lots of
otherwise-unavailable experiences, giving access to masses of
information, freeing up time spent formatting and dressing up
assignments which are better spent on content. But if you're a math
teacher and you're selecting lessons based on the technology they
use, you're off track. Pick your
core curriculum objective first, then select an appropriate technology, and teach as much
of its use as you need to achieve that objective.
Yes, I know, you really want that SUV! But resist! If you
spend all your "hard earned cash" on it, you might have
fun, and feel good, but you also may not have enough left over to do
the things you need to do!
--Jeffrey L.
Jones, Editor
|