Fayette County Public Schools

2001/2002 District Technology Assessment


Executive Summary

Two years ago, the Fayette County Public Schools undertook a process to answer several basic evaluation questions related to instructional technology implementation.  They are: 

  1. How have students been impacted by technology integration?

  2. Are our teachers using technology in ways that match both our district goals for technology use and the potential that exists for technology as an instructional tool?

  3.  Have we adequately allocated district technology resources so that students and teachers can realize the resources’ potential?

That process resulted in a district technology assessment that was presented to the Board of Education on February 14, 2000.  The Board requested that the assessment be repeated yearly to gauge progress.  The present report is the second of those follow-ups and the first opportunity to see longitudinal changes. 

The chart below provides an overview of results from the 01/02 District Technology Assessment (DTA).  The three research questions above are represented on the chart by clusters of bars for (a) student impact, (b) teacher impact, and (c) infrastructure allocation.  Within each cluster, the first bar represents district-wide performance in 99/00, the second bar represents 00/01, and the third bar represents 01/02. 

Figure 1.  Overall DTA Results


 

Based on the above data, the district is making significant progress in all areas, with a significantly positive 3-year trend in student impact.  The DTA also includes supplementary data on specific uses of technology that impact student achievement.  Those additional data are explained in more detail in the report, and they indicate that technology is having a positive impact on student achievement.  The report concludes with a set of recommendations that are summarized below. 

1.      Explore ways to make classroom computers more accessible to students (e.g., more computers and AlphaSmarts, position current computers in more accessible locations, projection devices, capture systems such as Mimio)

2.      High schools – Integrate technology into ALL classes, and not just selected classes.

3.      Middle schools – Increase technical support.

4.      Elementary schools – Increase keyboarding – both initial instruction and follow-up. 

5.      Increase student use of email, especially in grades 4-12.  (State BOE goal by 2003)

6.      Increase teacher classroom websites for parent communication, homework, class assignments, etc.

7.      Use online resources such as Lexile.com, Follett, and KYVL to match reading materials to students, based on their Lexile scores.

8.      Avoid use of drill and practice software and increase use of productivity tools such as FrontPage, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Inspiration, and HyperStudio for authentic classroom activities or projects. 

9.      When selecting software and other technology-based instructional materials, use materials that have been researched and proven to be effective.  (or, may do own research)

10. Provide teachers with a variety of methods of PD.

11. Monitor student progress on FCPS standards

12. Provide Middle School LAN technicians and meet CP goal for TRTs.

13. Use software and online resources that accompany textbooks.

14. Increase home communication via WWW & email.

15. Do not drop students off in the lab.

16. Increase network bandwidth and speed to improve streaming video, distance learning, and other applications that contribute to increased network traffic.

17. Increase the use of distance learning, such as Kentucky Virtual High School and video-linked classrooms, to better provide equitable access to instructional content across the district.