|
Addressing this question is the same as addressing the difficult and
broader question "What should we teach?" which, of course,
implies the even cloudier question, "Why do we teach?" If
you ask the forces behind Washington's No Child Left Behind,
Kentucky's Commonwealth Accountability Testing System (CATS), and
Fayette County's Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) and STAR Math,
there's an implied short answer: "Because your success as a
school or teacher will be measured by the success of your students
on our tests." The "why" is answered, and the
"what" just becomes the contents of the tests. As
professional educators, many of us find such an approach a bit
unsatisfying, since we define our role as teachers a little more
broadly than simply delivering someone else's content.
We'd like to think that, regardless of how routine our days may
sometimes appear, our roles are a bit more noble. Our main
"why" and "what" have to do with helping
students achieve their own goals, and the goals implied by
membership in a complex society - in short, we want to help kids,
and we want to improve our world. It's important to remember this
since, as one might guess, there's a lot of things important to us
and our charges which don't distill down to multiple-choice
questions on standards-based tests. One of those things is, of
course, technology.
The use of technology in most professional workplaces - from the
auto repair garage to the stock broker, from the receptionist to the
television news anchor, and everything in between - is well
documented and a given. Although our responsibility towards the
traditional curricular content has not changed, the presence and
importance of technology has added another agenda we can't ignore.
Most assuredly, the testing moguls will catch up with this, and it
will appear as a part of large assessment mechanisms. But if we care
about preparing students, and enhancing their experiences, we
shouldn't wait until we're forced!
But
as many who have followed my musings (both of them - my mother and
my wife!) know, there are things technology can do that feed and
encourage all the other things we must and/or should teach. In this
month's TIPS is one such
resource - video conferencing technology. This capability isn't new
- we featured a video
conference connection between Bryan Station High and Breckenridge
Elementary in our April
2002 edition of TIPS. However, the technology has improved,
making such connections easier and more flexible - take a look at
this month's Connections for details.
Connecting people is
one of the things technology does best. From the PA system to the
website, from the telephone to the international LISTSERV,
technology does a fabulous job of connecting students to
information, media, each other, and educational resources and
instructional helps.. Just as importantly, such technology can
instantly connect teachers and schools to each other, to
instructional resources (including lesson plans and ideas)...even to
the very standards over which their students will be assessed!
What should we teach? Not only must technology be a part of the
answer to that question, it will provide a medium and a forum
through which we can answer it. Why should we teach technology?
Because it will, without a doubt, help our students achieve their
goals. Whether it will match our other lofty aim - improving our
world - is, like any such pursuit, up to us...but the potential,
just like that in our students themselves, is there.
--Jeffrey L.
Jones, Editor
|